How Is the Indus Water Treaty India’s Greatest Untapped Weapon?

What is Indus Water Treaty?

The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) is a water-sharing agreement signed between India and Pakistan in 1960, brokered by the World Bank. It governs the use of the waters of six rivers that flow from India into Pakistan. The treaty allocates the three eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej) to India, while the three western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) are mostly reserved for Pakistan, with limited usage rights for India. It is considered one of the most successful water-sharing treaties globally, having survived multiple wars and tensions between the two countries, although calls for its renegotiation have grown recently.

How Many Rivers Does It Cover, Average Discharge, and How Much Pakistan Gets? 

The Indus Waters Treaty covers six major rivers of the Indus Basin:

Related posts

Agricultural Revolution in India Continues with a Greater Vigor

August 8, 2025

The Romance of belonging and the Engineering of Absence

August 7, 2025

Key Distribution:

• Pakistan gets around 80% of the total waters (~386 BCM annually).
• India gets around 20% (~49 BCM annually), limited largely to non-consumptive use (like run-of-the-river hydropower) on western rivers.

Context: Thus, even though the rivers originate in India, Pakistan enjoys the lion’s share of water under the treaty. India’s usage of western rivers is heavily restricted and monitored.

What Will Happen if India Stops Water to Pakistan?

Pros for Pakistan:

• None. Stoppage would cause a severe water crisis.
• Pakistan’s agriculture, especially Punjab’s cotton, wheat, and rice production, would suffer catastrophic losses.

Cons for Pakistan:

• Massive economic collapse in agriculture sector.
• Food shortages, inflation, and social unrest.
• Threats to hydroelectric power production.
• Potential humanitarian crisis and forced migration.

In essence, stopping the water would devastate Pakistan’s economy and destabilize the internal social fabric, possibly even leading to conflict escalation.

Pros for India:

• Assertion of sovereign rights over Indus waters.
• Strategic leverage over Pakistan for security reasons.
• More water availability for Indian agriculture and hydropower.

Cons for India:

• Possible international backlash (World Bank, UN pressure).
• Risk of escalating tensions, even leading to open conflict.
• Huge infrastructure costs needed to divert, store, and utilize additional waters.
• Environmental impacts within Indian territory, like submergence and altered riverine ecosystems.

Based on Pros and Cons for India, What Must India Do?

Given the pros and cons, India must adopt a balanced strategy rather than abrupt stoppage:

1. Gradual Utilization:
   India should maximize its rightful usage under the treaty – building run-of-the-river projects, water storage facilities, and irrigation channels – without technically breaching the treaty. Projects like Kishanganga and Ratle must be accelerated.

Diplomatic Positioning:
India should formally notify the world bodies (World Bank, United Nations) that Pakistan’s continued hostility nullifies the spirit of the treaty. Legal and diplomatic groundwork must be laid carefully before full withdrawal.

1. Environmental Safeguards:
   Water usage should prioritize sustainable practices like micro-irrigation, aquifer recharge, and eco-sensitive hydropower, so that environmental risks are minimized.
2. Internal Political Gain:
   India must publicize domestically that taking steps on Indus water rights is an assertion of sovereignty, boosting internal unity and morale, especially in sensitive states like Jammu & Kashmir and Punjab.
3. Phased Withdrawal Roadmap:
   If escalation is unavoidable, India must prepare a phased plan:
   • First, increase use of eastern rivers to near full capacity.
   • Second, maximize permissible usage of western rivers.
   • Third, gradually reduce flows, giving Pakistan time to adjust (thus softening international criticism).
4. Strategic Water Diplomacy:
   India should simultaneously offer joint water management dialogues to Afghanistan and even Iran (which share river linkages), isolating Pakistan diplomatically.

In sum, India must turn water into a strategic asset – leveraged carefully, not hastily.

How Can the Indus Water Treaty Be Used for Kashmir?

The Indus Water Treaty presents an enormous opportunity for Kashmir’s development and security:

1. Increased Local Hydropower:
   • J&K can massively develop small and medium hydropower projects under permissible limits.
   • This will generate electricity for remote areas and reduce reliance on polluting diesel generators.
2. Agricultural Transformation:
   • Kashmir’s traditional crops suffer from unreliable water availability.
   • By regulating tributary flows, irrigation networks can be expanded, boosting yields and incomes.
3. Flood Control Systems:
   • Controlled reservoirs on Jhelum and Chenab can prevent floods like 2014.
   • Protects Srinagar, Anantnag, Baramulla – major economic hubs.
4. Employment Generation:
   • Construction of water management infrastructure (canals, storage tanks) creates local jobs.
   • Long-term maintenance and operation of such systems can employ thousands of Kashmiris.
5. Environmental Restoration:
   • Wular Lake, Dal Lake, and many other wetlands could be revitalized with smart water management.
   • This would revive tourism, biodiversity, and the cultural landscape.
6. Political Stabilization:
   • Economic prosperity from water management can reduce separatist sentiments.
   • Investment in people’s welfare will create a stake for Kashmiris in a stable, thriving Indian Kashmir.

Thus, harnessing Indus waters responsibly could turn Kashmir from a political battlefield into an economic paradise.

Is It Possible for India to Hold All Water? What Are Risks of Holding It?

Technically, it is extremely difficult for India to completely hold or divert all Indus waters at present:

Challenges:

• Huge Infrastructure Needed: Massive dams, canals, and tunnels would be required across mountainous terrains.
• Ecological Risks: Stopping rivers could dry ecosystems, causing massive biodiversity loss.
• Local Opposition: People in J&K, Himachal, Punjab could oppose large-scale displacement projects.
• Climate Change: Himalayan glaciers feeding Indus rivers are shrinking. Future water flow is uncertain.
• International Pressure: World Bank, UN, even allies like the US or EU could pressure India to honor treaties.
• Risk of Escalation: Pakistan treats water stoppage as an “act of war.” Full stoppage could trigger serious military retaliation.

Technical Feasibility:

• India could store some water (around 3.6 million acre-feet) as allowed under the treaty.
• Full stoppage would require storage beyond India’s current hydrological capacity.

Risks:

• Overburdened storage systems could fail (dam bursts, flood disasters).
• Political backlash domestically and internationally.
• Legal cases at the International Court of Justice or arbitration panels.

Best Strategy: India should maximize usage legally under the treaty first. Parallelly, prepare for gradual reduction, coupled with massive ecological engineering projects (like groundwater recharge) rather than attempting abrupt full stoppage. Thus, India’s approach must be strategic, patient, and intelligent, not impulsive.

Shrunken Lakes in Kashmir That Can Be Replenished by Rivers of the Indus System

How These Estimates Are Made:

• Water Volume Requirements: Based on lake surface area and average depth lost.
• Supply Capacity: Taking into account permissible diversions from Jhelum, Doodhganga, Sindh, and other feeders without breaching treaty clauses.
• Assumptions: Moderate desilting is done before replenishment begins; no new major contamination sources arise.

Important Points:

• Wular and Hokersar are the top priorities because they act as natural flood sponges for Kashmir Valley.
• Dal and Anchar Lakes need sewage control simultaneously, otherwise river-fed replenishment will worsen pollution.
• Channel Restoration is critical  –  reconnecting ancient waterways (like Nallah Amir Khan, Mar Canal) is necessary to allow river water to reach these lakes naturally.
• Eco-engineering Solutions (like artificial wetlands at entry points) should be used to filter the river water before entering these fragile lakes.

Can Holding Water Make Kashmir a Satisar Again?

The idea of Kashmir turning into Satisar – the legendary primordial lake described in Hindu legends – is fascinating but practically improbable, even if India holds back Indus waters.

Satisar was said to cover the entire Kashmir Valley before it drained to create habitable land. Today, holding water through large reservoirs, dams, and blocked river flows could indeed increase localized waterlogging, expand existing wetlands, and temporarily flood low-lying areas. Places like the Wular basin, Hokersar wetland, and even parts of Srinagar could experience partial submersion if excess water is mismanaged.

However, for the whole valley to revert to a Satisar-like state, gigantic geological and infrastructural changes would be needed, far beyond mere river holding – such as permanently blocking river exits like Baramulla gorge, which naturally drains the valley into Pakistan.

Moreover, modern urbanization, embankments, and altered topography make such a full-scale transformation virtually impossible.

Thus, strategic water holding can create more wetlands, restore shrunken lakes, and increase water abundance, but Kashmir becoming Satisar again is mythologically inspiring but scientifically implausible – unless an unprecedented tectonic or engineering event occurs.

Nonetheless, even partial revival of Kashmir’s historic watery glory could transform its ecology, economy, and climate dramatically.

Vision for Future Kashmir

Imagine a Kashmir where its rivers run fuller, its lakes breathe deeper, and the Valley reclaims its title as the “Emerald of the Himalayas.” If Indus waters are harnessed intelligently  –  not aggressively, but lovingly  –  a quiet transformation could unfold. Wular could once again stretch its arms wide, cradling bird migrations from distant lands. Dal could regain its crystal clarity, where the mirrored reflection of the Zabarwan hills would seem like another world beneath. Houseboats could sail across waters, no longer battling weeds and silt but gliding as they once did, years ago.

The nutrient-rich soil of Kashmir would sip from these veins of life, thriving with renewed abundance. Hokersar, Shalbugh, and Anchar wetlands would become breathing lungs, safeguarding the Valley against floods and droughts.

Tourism would not just be about sightseeing; it would become a pilgrimage into nature’s lap. A reborn Kashmir would not need to sell violence or tragedy  –  it would sell beauty, serenity, and the profound memory of what it means to coexist with water, earth, and sky.

This vision is not utopian. With wisdom, patience, and courage, Kashmir’s second birth is within reach.

A Moral Reflection

As India stands at the threshold of reclaiming its waters, a profound moral question must be asked: Should man seek to dominate nature, or serve as its faithful steward?

The temptation is great  –  to dam, divert, and dominate rivers to bend them to human will. Yet the story of Satisar reminds us that water is not merely a resource. It is a sacred presence, a giver of life, memory, and balance. In ancient Kashmiri belief, springs were not exploited; they were worshipped. Lakes were not drained for convenience; they were revered as living deities.

To hold back the Indus waters solely for political triumph would be to repeat the mistakes of countless fallen civilizations. But to hold the waters to heal the land, to revive the lakes, to nourish life without hubris  –  that would be the true dharma of our time.

Restoring Kashmir’s waters must not become an act of vengeance, but an act of gratitude  –  a sacred offering to the land that has nurtured civilizations for millennia. In this, Kashmir could teach the world again: that power is not in conquest, but in preservation; not in silencing rivers, but in listening to their ancient song.