Tackling corruption

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

That rampant corruption is the main cause of concern and major irritant for the common masses here is known to all. But thus far besides the verbal assurances about ridding the state of the dangerous menace, successive governments have done precious little to tackle corruption. This is indeed why Jammu and Kashmir has maintained the dubious distinction of being among the most corrupt states. Now add to it the empirical evidence pointing to the co-relation between corruption and conflict, it is really unfortunate that the problem has not got the kind of attention it deserves.

Interestingly, in a bid to wrap their unconcern, inefficiency and lack of initiative with lame excuses, the officials here often take recourse to blaming corruption on politically turbulent situation in the state, but fact of the matter is that everybody has got a vested interest in continuation of corruption. Had it not been so, then of course the situation here would have been different. Now if anybody in the officialdom, particularly those manning various monitoring wings of the government claim they are unaware of corruption and nepotism ruling the roost here, they are simply lying. Because corruption is today the single most important factor pushing people away from the government and its systems. And it is one of the major non-political factors contributing even more than the political causes to the continuation of conflict and hostilities here. So blaming corruption on political situation is nothing but an absurd excuse that has been, and is being cited to shield the corrupt and patronize corruption.

The war against the corruption has to begin from the top. With due respect to everybody, it remains an unfortunate and uncomfortable reality that corruption begins its journey and derives its strength from the top political hierarchy only. Our politicians are corrupt and so are our senior bureaucrats. So even the rot is there at the top, expecting the lower levels of administration to be free of the problem is just too foolish. Therefore, if the state has to deliver itself from the clutches of corruption, it is the top hierarchy of the politics and bureaucracy which has to be cleaned first. Training guns at the lower-rung officials does not help; it hasn’t thus far. If the anti-corruption agencies of the state really mean business they will have to initiate a “cleanliness drive” from the top; lower cadres of officialdom will fall in line of their own.

Every now and then we are told about the action initiated against the corrupt, however, instead of giving us details of the anti-corruption cases that have been taken to the logical conclusion by fixing responsibility on the unscrupulous and subsequent punishment to them, we were only told about the figures about the number of corruption cases that have been registered by various agencies against the corrupt government functionaries.

This is really unfortunate that — when the concerned agencies should have been flaunting the number of cases solved with the corrupt getting punishments, they are publicizing the figures about the number of cases registered against the corrupt officials. These figures mean nothing – because each case take years to complete and even after that time there is no guarantee about the system being able to fix responsibility and punish the unscrupulous! Fact of the matter is that state’s anti-corruption agencies are very rarely able to fix responsibility on the corrupt. Besides both investigation and prosecution in anti-corruption cases is so tardy that anti-corruption laws and legal hassles have long ceased to be effective deterrents for the corrupt.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *