Centre’s decision to halt the proposed railway projects in south Kashmir is a moment that highlights the primacy of people’s voices over unchecked infrastructure ambitions. For nearly two years, surveys for new rail alignments had unsettled villages across Anantnag, Pulwama and Shopian, where residents feared the destruction of orchards, paddy fields and fragile ecosystems. The announcement that these projects will not proceed has brought immense relief to thousands of families who had pleaded that their land and livelihoods not be sacrificed in the name of progress.
The proposed Bijbehara-Pahalgam and Awantipora-Shopian lines, spanning over 40 km and 27.6 km respectively, were initially envisioned as extensions of the Baramulla-Srinagar corridor. Yet, as survey work advanced, the stark reality of what lay in their path became undeniable. Farmers estimated that six to seven lakh fruit-bearing trees across nearly a dozen villages would be felled. In districts where each kanal of land holds 15 to 20 mature apple trees and most families own only two or three kanal, the loss of even a small orchard would have meant economic devastation. In Shopian, the Valley’s largest apple-producing district, the threat was existential, as generations had depended on orchards not only for income but for identity and survival.
Beyond the economic toll, environmentalists warned of irreversible damage to south Kashmir’s delicate terrain. Large-scale excavation, embankments, and tree felling would destabilise slopes, accelerate soil erosion and pollute riverine systems. In a region already vulnerable to climate stress, such disruption would have compounded ecological fragility. The suspension of the projects acknowledges that development cannot be pursued by disregarding environmental balance.
The decision also reflects a rare responsiveness to grassroots concerns. Farmers, orchardists, and local communities voiced their apprehensions, and their arguments were heard at the highest level. Roads and highways already connect these areas, and the proposed rail lines offered little genuine utility. They would have merely touched tourist destinations without serving pressing public demand. By recognising that infrastructure must serve real needs rather than symbolic expansion, the Centre has demonstrated a willingness to recalibrate priorities in line with local realities.
This responsiveness marks a departure from the usual narrative where local concerns are sidelined. Projects that uproot farmers cannot be called progress. Development must be inclusive, transparent and sensitive to agrarian economies. Kashmir’s fertile land is scarce, and its orchards are not just economic assets but cultural lifelines. To destroy them would be to push rural families into uncertainty and erode the social fabric of the Valley. The suspension of these projects affirms that protecting livelihoods is as important as building connectivity.
Importantly, this move is not a rejection of rail expansion but a reorientation towards projects that promise genuine utility. Work on the Baramulla-Uri section has already been completed, and surveys for the Jammu-Rajouri line are progressing. These initiatives, unlike the halted ones, hold the potential to strengthen integration and connectivity without undermining local economies. Meanwhile, the successful operation of Vande Bharat trains connecting Kashmir with the rest of the country has already demonstrated the transformative power of railways. The challenge now is to expand frequency and capacity so that connectivity serves people effectively, especially during times when flights are cancelled or highways are closed.
This decision is a reminder that development must be rooted in dialogue, not imposed from above. It must protect the environment, respect the farmer, and balance ambition with sustainability. By listening to the voices of orchardists and environmentalists, the Centre has shown that progress is not measured in kilometres of track laid but in the preservation of lives, landscapes and livelihoods.