By: Mohd Younus Bhat
“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” — Nelson Mandela.
From chalkboards to digital screens, from whiteboards to smartboards, and now to AI-powered learning—education has always evolved in tandem with technological advancements. As artificial intelligence and digital tools redefine the learning experience, it is imperative that we embrace this transformation with wisdom and adaptability, rather than succumbing to fear or premature alarmism. After all, as the pinnacle of creation, humans possess the intelligence to harness technology for progress rather than viewing it as an existential threat.
Recognizing the importance of addressing digital addiction with a nuanced and rational perspective, Amar Singh College, Srinagar, recently hosted a three-day expert interaction on the subject. This commendable initiative brought together specialists from diverse fields to engage in insightful discussions on the risks, realities, and solutions surrounding digital dependency among young minds. Rather than advocating extreme measures, the dialogue emphasized a balanced approach—one that acknowledges both the advantages and potential pitfalls of digital technology, fostering responsible and mindful usage.
Risks of Digital Overuse
Experts have correctly pointed out that excessive screen time negatively affects cognitive and emotional development. Studies have linked digital addiction to attention deficits, anxiety, sleep disturbances, and decreased creativity. Overconsumption of digital stimuli overstimulates the brain’s dopamine system, reducing motivation for meaningful offline activities. Additionally, the overuse of technology has been associated with diminished social skills, as children prefer digital interactions over real-world engagements. These concerns are valid and require immediate attention.
One of the most effective solutions proposed is the integration of digital literacy into the school curriculum. Teaching children how to use technology responsibly rather than completely restricting access is a logical and proactive step. Schools should provide structured lessons on media literacy, critical thinking, and time management to ensure that students understand the benefits and risks of digital engagement.
Another essential aspect of the solution is parental responsibility. Children mimic the habits of adults, and if parents themselves are engrossed in their digital devices, they set a poor example. Implementing digital-free zones at home, encouraging outdoor activities, and fostering in-person communication can significantly help mitigate digital addiction among children.
Exaggerated Concerns
Despite valid concerns, certain claims made in discussions around digital addiction lack logical or scientific support. One such exaggerated claim is that “Digital addiction will render children brain-damaged for life.” While excessive screen time does affect cognitive functions, the human brain is highly adaptable and capable of recovery when digital habits are regulated. Rather than assuming irreversible damage, the focus should be on reducing overexposure and promoting offline activities.
Similarly, the proposal to eliminate technology from classrooms entirely is impractical. The modern world is built on digital literacy, and removing technology from education would put students at a disadvantage. Instead, schools should strike a balance by integrating technology in ways that enhance learning rather than replacing traditional teaching methods entirely.
Another flawed argument is that banning social media will solve the problem. Countries like Australia have debated social media bans for children, but such measures often drive young users to underground platforms or VPNs. Instead of outright bans, parental controls, content regulations, and structured screen time guidelines offer a more effective way to manage digital consumption.
Finally, the assertion that all internet exposure leads to dangerous behavioural changes oversimplifies the issue. While exposure to harmful content is a concern, responsible and guided digital engagement provides numerous benefits, from educational resources to creative platforms for self-expression. The key is not to vilify the internet but to teach children how to navigate it wisely.
A Balanced and Feasible Solution
The best way forward is a middle-ground approach that acknowledges both the benefits and risks of digital technology. Instead of outright bans or unrestricted access, a structured and practical strategy can help manage digital addiction while leveraging technology for positive outcomes.
- Digital Literacy Education
Example: Finland’s Media Literacy Curriculum
Finland, known for its top-tier education system, has integrated digital literacy and media education into its national curriculum. Students are taught critical thinking, responsible internet usage, cyber safety, and time management skills from an early age. This approach has helped students navigate social media wisely, recognize misinformation, and develop healthy digital habits without banning technology entirely.
Key Takeaway: Schools worldwide should incorporate structured media literacy programs to help children develop digital discipline rather than fall victim to overuse.
- Parental Awareness and Role Modelling
Example: Bill Gates’ and Steve Jobs’ Parenting Approach
Tech moguls Bill Gates and Steve Jobs—pioneers of the digital revolution—restricted their children’s screen time at home. Gates did not allow his children to own a smartphone until age 14, while Jobs famously limited iPad usage in his household. These examples highlight the importance of parental regulation and active involvement in children’s digital consumption.
Key Takeaway: Parents should set clear boundaries, engage in offline activities with their children, and create digital-free zones (e.g., no screens during family meals) to promote healthier habits.
- Regulated Use in Education
Example: Singapore’s Smart Classroom Initiative
Singapore has successfully implemented a hybrid education model, where technology is integrated into classrooms without replacing traditional learning methods. Interactive digital platforms enhance lessons, but students are also encouraged to engage in written assignments, group discussions, and hands-on activities to maintain a balanced learning experience.
Key Takeaway: Schools should use technology as a supplement, not a substitute, for learning, ensuring that digital tools enhance education rather than serve as distractions.
- Encouraging Outdoor and Creative Activities
Example: Denmark’s “Forest Schools”
Denmark has introduced “Forest Schools,” where children spend a significant portion of their school day outdoors, engaging in physical, hands-on learning experiences. Research shows that children in these programs develop better social skills, problem-solving abilities, and physical health compared to those who spend excessive time on screens.
Key Takeaway: Schools and parents should encourage outdoor sports, creative hobbies like painting and music, and interactive group activities as enjoyable alternatives to excessive screen time.
- Community and Policy Interventions
Example: South Korea’s Government Digital Detox Programs
In response to rising digital addiction among children, South Korea introduced “digital detox camps”, where students engage in outdoor activities, team-building exercises, and mindfulness training to reduce screen dependence. Additionally, the government mandates educational programs on responsible digital usage in schools.
Key Takeaway: Governments should implement awareness campaigns, regulatory measures, and digital detox initiatives to help young people develop healthier digital habits.
Final Words
Digital addiction is a pressing issue, but it is not an insurmountable one. The key lies in regulation, education, and balance rather than extreme measures. Instead of creating panic around technology, we must equip children with the skills to navigate the digital world responsibly. If used wisely, technology can be an incredible tool for learning, innovation, and personal growth. The goal should not be to eliminate it but to ensure that it serves as a tool for empowerment rather than a source of harm.
The future depends not on banning screens but on teaching the next generation how to use them wisely.
The writer is a Ph.D. Student, CSIR-NET, DST-INSPIRE fellow & Gold Medalist, School of Physical, Chemical & Applied Sciences (SPCAS)
Pondicherry University
