Dr.Shiben Krishen Raina

The Crumbling State of TV Debates

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

In the modern media landscape, political debates should serve as a vital forum for exchanging ideas, analyzing policies, and fostering substantive civic discourse. However, a concerning trend has emerged in recent years – the alarming deterioration in the quality and integrity of these televised debates. From perpetual interruptions to a blatant disregard for core issues, the state of political discourse on television has plunged to depths that threaten the very foundations of democratic dialogue.

One of the most glaring symptoms of this decline is the prevalence of participants incessantly talking over each other. Instead of engaging in respectful and thoughtful exchanges, panelists frequently devolve into loud shouting competitions, rendering meaningful conversation a near impossibility to listen to. This not only diminishes the value and purpose of the debate itself but also actively alienates viewers waiting and eager to seek informed and constructive discourse.

Furthermore, a troubling tendency has taken root – the tendency of participants to stray from the central topic or issue at hand. Whether motivated by a desire to deflect criticism or a lack of adequate preparation, speakers habitually turn off from the main issue and thus leave audience frustrated and disengaged. This consistent deviation from the core themes undermines the very purpose of political debates and erodes public trust in the media’s ability to facilitate informed discussions.

Another troubling phenomenon plaguing modern political debates on TV is the pervasive expression of anger, hostility, and personal attacks by the participants creating a problematic and helpless situation for the anchor. Rather than presenting well-reasoned arguments and engaging in civil discourse, some panelists resort to inflammatory rhetoric and worthless assaults. This not only detracts from the substantive merits of the debate but also sets a dangerous precedent for civil discourse in society at large.

Moreover, the habit of indiscriminately talking about prepared talking-points repeatedly has become rampant in political debates. Instead of offering genuine insights or engaging with opposing viewpoints in a meaningful way, participants too often resort to parroting pre-scripted narratives, resulting in a shallow and unproductive exchange devoid of reliable discourse.

As viewers witness this landscape of much-too stale and hackneyed political debates, the temptation to simply switch off the television altogether or seek refuge in entertainment programming grows increasingly. Succumbing to this urge is indicative of the vicious cycle of declining discourse and further diminishes the media’s vital role as a catalyst for informed civic engagement. 

It is incumbent upon all stakeholders in the media industry to take proactive and decisive steps to address this crisis and restore integrity to political debates. This may involve implementing stricter guidelines for participant conduct, fostering a culture of accountability, and prioritizing substantive dialogue over sensationalism and spectacle.

Crucially, viewers themselves bear a profound responsibility to demand better from the media and hold broadcasters accountable for the quality of their programming. By actively engaging with content that upholds the principles of respectful discourse and meaningful exchanges, and by vocalizing dissatisfaction with substandard offerings, audiences can drive positive change and reclaim the integrity of political discourse.

In the end, the crumbling state of political debates on television represents a crisis of civic discourse that demands immediate attention and strenuous action. Only by recognizing the root causes of this decline and taking decisive steps to address them can we hope to reclaim the integrity of political discourse and ensure that television remains a platform for informed civic engagement, democratic participation, and the robust exchange of ideas that represent a healthy democratic society.

Writer is Former Fellow at IIAS, Shimla, Former Senior Fellow, Ministry of Culture, Govt. of India. [email protected]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *