• About us
  • Contact us
  • Our team
  • Terms of Service
Monday, February 2, 2026
Kashmir Images - Latest News Update
Epaper
  • TOP NEWS
  • CITY & TOWNS
  • LOCAL
  • BUSINESS
  • NATION
  • WORLD
  • SPORTS
  • OPINION
    • EDITORIAL
    • ON HERITAGE
    • CREATIVE BEATS
    • INTERALIA
    • WIDE ANGLE
    • OTHER VIEW
    • ART SPACE
  • Photo Gallery
  • CARTOON
  • EPAPER
No Result
View All Result
Kashmir Images - Latest News Update
No Result
View All Result
Home TOP NEWS

SC refers Ayodhya dispute for mediation

Press Trust of india by Press Trust of india
March 9, 2019
in TOP NEWS
A A
0
SC to fix schedule of hearing of Ayodhya land dispute cases in January next year
FacebookTwitterWhatsapp

New Delhi, Mar 08: The Supreme Court Friday referred the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case for mediation by a panel headed by retired apex court judge F M I Kalifulla to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement and gave it eight weeks to complete its proceedings.

The other members of the panel will be Sri Sri Ravishankar and senior advocate Sriram Panchu, said a five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and added that they can co-opt more members if needed.

More News

Zero-tolerance for terrorism must be an uncompromising universal norm: India

Work on museum of goddess in Katra to begin soon: LG

Search operation narrowed down following encounter with terrorists in Kishtwar

Load More

The bench, also comprising justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer, said the mediation proceedings will be held at Faizabad in Uttar Pradesh and directed the state government to make necessary arrangements for it.

While referring the matter for mediation, the bench said there is no legal impediment to send the matter for mediation for arriving at a possible settlement.

The bench said the mediation proceedings will start within a week from Friday and they will be held in-camera. No media, neither print nor electronic, will report its proceedings, it said.

The bench said “utmost confidentiality” should be maintained in the mediation proceedings to ensure its success.

The apex court said the progress report of the mediation proceedings be filed before it within four weeks and directed that it be completed within eight weeks.

In case of any difficulty, the chairman will inform the apex court registry about it, it added.

The court said that mediation proceedings will be held as per the applicable norms.

On Wednesday, the bench had reserved the order after hearing various contesting parties.

Hindu bodies, except Nirmohi Akhara, have opposed the apex court’s suggestion to refer the issue for mediation, while Muslim bodies have supported it.

The bench had concluded the hearing by asking stakeholders to give the names of possible mediators.

The apex court in its Wednesday hearing observed that the issue is not about 1,500 square feet land, but about religious sentiments. The bench said it was conscious of the gravity and impact of the issue on “public sentiment” and also on the “body politic of the country”.

It said the judges were aware of the history and were seeing that the dispute be resolved amicably. “It is not only about property. It is about mind, heart and healing, if possible,” the bench said.

The bench also said it was not appropriate to pre-judge that the mediation would fail and people would not agree with the decision.

“We are not concerned what has happened in the past. Don’t you think we have read the history. We are not concerned what Babur did in the past or who was the king and who invaded. We cannot undo what has happened but we can go into what exists in the present moment,” the bench said when a lawyer contended that “injustices were meted out to Hindus by invaders” in the past.

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the legal heirs of original litigant M Siddiq, said outlining of the dispute is not necessary and the court can order mediation by a mediator, when parties are unable to settle it.

To this, the bench said that there may not be one mediator but a panel of mediators to deal with the issue.

During the hearing, Justice Chandrachud said it would be very difficult to bind millions of people by way of mediation considering it is not just a property dispute between parties but a dispute involving two communities.

Senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan, appearing for Hindu deity Ram Lala Virajman, said, “We are even willing to crowd-fund a mosque somewhere else but no negotiations can take place with respect of Lord Rama’s birthplace. Mediation won’t serve any purpose,” he said.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, said the court should refer the matter for mediation only when there exists an element of settlement.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

Previous Post

Will take every step to resolve Ayodhya issue amicably: Justice Kallifulla

Next Post

Army trooper abducted:  Sources

Press Trust of india

Press Trust of india

Related Posts

Zero-tolerance for terrorism must be an uncompromising universal norm: India

Zero-tolerance for terrorism must be an uncompromising universal norm: India
February 1, 2026

New Delhi:  India on Saturday conveyed to Arab League member nations that "zero-tolerance" for terrorism must be an "uncompromising universal...

Read moreDetails

Work on museum of goddess in Katra to begin soon: LG

Work on museum of goddess in Katra to begin soon: LG
February 1, 2026

Jammu:  A museum of the goddesses comprising replicas and representations of major 'devi' pilgrimage sites from across India will come...

Read moreDetails

Search operation narrowed down following encounter with terrorists in Kishtwar

VDGs want automatic weapons, enhanced allowances
February 1, 2026

Jammu: A search operation, which has been underway to neutralise three holed-up Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir's Kishtwar, has...

Read moreDetails

DG CRPF reviews security and operational reparedness in the Valley

DG CRPF reviews security and operational reparedness in the Valley
February 1, 2026

SRINAGAR: Director General, CRPF, G. P. Singh visited Srinagar on January 30 and 31, 2026, to review the operational preparedness...

Read moreDetails

Another accused identified by eyewitness in 1990 IAF attack case

City court convicts 2 persons in acid attack case
February 1, 2026

Jammu:  After JKLF chief Yasin Malik, his close confidant Shoukat Bakshi was identified by an eyewitness before a special court...

Read moreDetails

ACB submits chargesheet in 2011 ration fraud case in Jammu

Police produces chargesheet in Bemina terrorist attack case
February 1, 2026

Jammu: The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) submitted a chargesheet on Saturday in a corruption case against officials and other persons for...

Read moreDetails
Next Post
Three incidents of abduction reported in Pulwama

Army trooper abducted:  Sources

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Our team
  • Terms of Service
E-Mailus: kashmirimages123@gmail.com

© 2025 Kashmir Images - Designed by GITS.

No Result
View All Result
  • TOP NEWS
  • CITY & TOWNS
  • LOCAL
  • BUSINESS
  • NATION
  • WORLD
  • SPORTS
  • OPINION
    • EDITORIAL
    • ON HERITAGE
    • CREATIVE BEATS
    • INTERALIA
    • WIDE ANGLE
    • OTHER VIEW
    • ART SPACE
  • Photo Gallery
  • CARTOON
  • EPAPER

© 2025 Kashmir Images - Designed by GITS.