Philosophy and Metaphysics
By: Towseef Ahmad
Thence we must try to produce the most value out of the deontic outcomes because it is ultimately the right action that secures a best place for us in the society. The question is that if we need metaphysics at all, then we must be able to construct the best methods to look into the theorems of a priori knowledge, epistemology, phenomenology and the metametaphysics. The characteristica universalis for a basic metaphysical theorem runs sometimes on the principles of scientific and plenary notions and sometimes on the features of the indeterminacy. The same is true of the philosophy of geometry and situations of disputations and inferences and thence we must review the axiomatic theory of abstract objects. The fact is that metaphysics entitles us to search and find the logical and differential calculus for varied scientific purposes and positions and requires and inspires us to observe the given phenomena under different conditions and hypothesis.
The moral action picture should begin with those actions which are of primary importance in the welfare of the people and the citizenry. Therefore we should induct those features which would enable us to characterise the structure of reality according to the deontic terms and practices. Metaphysics provides us the holistic, explanative axiomatizations in the domains and discourse dynamics of many fascinating endeavours and in analysis of natural language and in the reconstructing of properties, relations, propositions, functions and apriori entourage. Thence we must separate the coherent and formulable from the incoherent and unformulable theorems and practices through first order a priori investigation and knowledge and through appropriate philosophy and metaphysics.
The question is that whether every metaphysical structure is fundamental and independent of auxiliary structures and axiomatizations or certain accounts are superior to other accounts and theorems and grounding relations. This all depends upon the plausibility of the hypothesis generally and upon the notions of the hypothetical metaphysics in specific situations. The answer is that the contemporary metaphysics is preoccupied with the discourse dynamics and relations of grounding. Therefore our intuitions can also back our consumer judgments and our moral judgements in situations of dependency on philosophies and theorems of epistemology and phenomenology and we must differentiate between the axioms of situation semantics from the notion and predicables of the world semantics.
Such rationalization, differentiation and stratification will help and enable us to get the credible sources of information from the grassroots, so that the necessary steps can be taken for the redressal of the grievances. Therefore we must give the command of action, as and when it is needed to protect our citizenry from the menace of fraud, inequity, corruption and the plethora of abuses and misuses. Therefore what becomes apparent here is that the constitutional tolerance which has been mandated for the pluralistic cohesiveness and inclusive existence cannot be vitiated on baseless and grim grounds, thus bypassing the mandates of law and rules without any legitimate credibility.
Even the things of the discrimination which are unconstitutional and ultravires the statutory enactments should not be tolerated. The judiciary should keep a strong vigil on the rights and interests of its gullible citizenry all the times. The exciting constitution produces exciting horizons of deontic welfare through the practicability, decidability and the tractability of those ideal parameters which are based on genuine and elenctic frameworks. Therefore the constitutional craft which has been designed for the emancipation of the egalitarian values should be further harnessed and nurtured through interdisciplinary requirements of structural philosophy and metaphilosophical naturalism. We must take the position on battles and our approach should be ethical and based on predicables of virtue, goodwill and justice. The credulity in the instant development of the long established practices of the conventional irony stands the standpoint of efficacious outgrowth. The moral discourse transcends the several alternatives of ethical relevance and emotivism of freestanding sources of empathy and equality.
Therefore from the nature of the underlying modern thought it becomes inevitable that we must protect our inalienable and immutable rights without facing hurdles and hardships. The real zeal of the constitution lies in the fact that it has delineated a huge number of rights for us, which are essential for our intrinsic worth and moral upliftment. Therefore it is not a futile fashion; it is a pleasure to have the constitutional rights with us. The profound impact of the constitution mandates the salience of epistemic justice, which is a bonus in the representation of the rights envisaged by this vibrant source. The constitution caters to the logical positivism through the separation of the three organs of the government into three distinct roles. The executive, the legislature and the judiciary shall render their assignments according to the principles and notions of the constitution and the constitutional interface.
